chapter1
chapter2
chapter3
chapter4
chapter5
chapter6
chapter7
chapter8
chapter9
chapter10
chapter11
chapter12
chapter13
chapter14
chapter15
people
about

9. Water Politics & The Third Isla Vista Cityhood Campaign

By Carrie Topliffe
The 1980s started slowly in Isla Vista as the reality of the Reagan years set in. CETA job-training positions at community agencies were wiped out, cutting back local services dramatically. After a decade of advisory-only community government, citizen participation began to wane, as did voting in strictly local elections. This produced some dramatic results as Carrie Topliffe points out in this chapter, which originally appeared in the Isla Vista Free Press as two articles in the spring of 1987.

Topliffe was an elected member of the Isla Vista Park Board 1980-84. She has also been on the board of the Isla Vista Open Door Medical Clinic since 1977.


In November 1985, voter turnout in Isla Vista was the worst in years, continuing a decade-long trend of declining participation of Isla Vista residents in local elections. Significantly, it was the watershed year for control of the Goleta Water Board, the elected five-member body that supplies water to the unincorporated communities of Goleta and Isla Vista. After fourteen years of dominance by environmentalists, the Water District fell under the control of a group of men determined to ease water restrictions for new development.

To the beleaguered citizens of Isla Vista, packed into the densest, most poorly planned community in the county, the effects may be dramatic for years to come.

What happened? What changed Isla Vista from the most dependable liberal voting bloc in the county to a seat of apathy mustering only a few thousand-vote turnout? Perhaps the answer can be found in the history of Isla Vista's place in local environmental politics.

In 1971, Llana Sherman, Jose Martinez, and John McCord were elected to the Goleta Water Board on a platform that called for making natural resources such as water "an input into the planning process." In December of that year, they were instrumental in passing a Board-declared moratorium on all new water hook-ups. They justified this radical step with evidence that underground water supplies were being depleted faster than they were being replenished by natural sources. The Goleta Valley was growing larger than the environment could reliably support.

In acknowledging the connection between vital environmental resources and the human community, the Goleta Water Board was in the forefront of a nationwide move toward environmental awareness. Growth could no longer be seen as having no limits, nor could natural resources be stressed beyond their ability to recover without exacting a terrible future toll.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 home

Šislavistahistory.com 2002