chapter1
chapter2
chapter3
chapter4
chapter5
chapter6
chapter7
chapter8
chapter9
chapter10
chapter11
chapter12
chapter13
chapter14
chapter15
people
about

cont...

I was urged by several Isla Vista friends to run as a balance to Buttny on the environmentalist slate. But when I approached Donna Hone, she said that all three positions were filled on the environmentalist's slate. Resentment grew in some Isla Vista circles because of the unwillingness of the leadership of the Goleta environmentalists to share power with Isla Vista in the selection of candidates for an office that required such significant Isla Vista voter support. There were some weeks of discussion between us, but no compromise was reached.

I ended up running as an "independent" environmentalist.

The irony was that Buttny was later pressured by the Goleta-based environmentalists to withdraw from the race (although his name remained on the ballot) when information surfaced about his felony arrest during the 1960's antiwar movement.

These events and stresses made it a difficult campaign, and the results were upsetting. Hone managed to keep her seat, finishing third to fellow incumbents Don Weaver and Gary MacFarland. Although I gathered 67% of the vote in the I.V./UCSB area and came in first in every IV/UCSB precinct, my support in Goleta was very weak and I finished a disappointing sixth overall for the three contested seats.

The next year held a big surprise, as the environmentalists were forced to undergo another election challenge a year ahead of schedule. In 1984, led by developer Jerry Beaver, a recall campaign was mounted against theWater Board majority. Although Ed Maschke, Pat Shewczyk and Donna Hone were successful in holding on to their seats, the campaign was taxing financially and emotionally.

"We had to go through four elections in two years," laments Maschke in explaining that this period was very difficult on the Goleta environmentalists who were active in the 1983 and 1984 Water Board campaigns, in Bill Wallace's third district supervisorial re-election campaign in 1984, and then in the 1985 Water Board election. "It was a tremendous drain on our financial resources, as well as just physically draining on everybody."

The results were critical. After ten years of dominance, the environmentalists lost control of the Goleta Water Board in 1985.

"People just generally took the threat of us losing both our seats not nearly as seriously as they had in the past," says Maschke, attributing this to the overwhelming support the environmentalists received in the recall election of 1984.

Maschke also speculates that the 1985 election was the one in which the difference between the environmentalists and their opponents was most blurred in the minds of the voters.

"The developers always posture themselves as having the same positions as us," Maschke says. "The only difference (they say) is that they could do a better job. In the last election, they were just successful in hiding the source of their money."

Ultimately, however, it was probably Isla Vista that dealt the lethal blow.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 home

Šislavistahistory.com 2002