chapter1
chapter2
chapter3
chapter4
chapter5
chapter6
chapter7
chapter8
chapter9
chapter10
chapter11
chapter12
chapter13
chapter14
chapter15
people
about

cont...

For some years, it was obvious that students were becoming more conservative, more interested in finances than social issues. As one indicator, the popularity of campus majors was changing. In 1975, there were 664 undergraduates in the Economics Department; by 1985, there were 2,281. In comparison, the Environmental Studies Program, first offered as a major in 1970, saw a steady decrease in enrollment by 1985.

Cathy Buchanan, an Environmental Studies graduate who worked on the Maschke/Schewzyk campaign in 1981, notes the changes in student values since her first undergraduate days in 1977.

"In those years, the environmental movement was still new and big, there was a greater awareness of the interrelatedness of natural systems than there is now," she says. "Nowadays, students don't seem to put an economic value on natural resources. Actually, environmental resources, because of their interrelatedness, have a very high economic value, because when you destroy one thing you're actually destroying everything."

As students were becoming more conservative, they were also beginning to mouth a traditional piece of conservative thought. Voter registration workers reported that students were often choosing to disenfranchise themselves, claiming that as transient residents of the area, it was not proper that they vote here.

"Historically, those arguments have been used by the people who didn't want students to have the vote. But to hear students adopt those attitudes just blew me out. I was amazed," said Ed Maschke. "This line of thought did not acknowledge that students, as a constituency, have a very permanent and significant profile in the local community."

In Isla Vista, the result was a dismal combination of poor turnout and lessened support for the environmentalists. Traditionally, a turnout of three to four thousand in Isla Vista was expected up to that point. However, in 1985 only 2,082 actually voted, or 14.9% of the registered voters, and of those, only 62% voted for the environmentalist slate. The loss of Maschke and Shewczyk's seats could be attributed directly to the erosion of the Isla Vista bloc vote. An additional 1,310 voters casting ballots for the environmentalist slate would have nudged them to victory.

Instead, Chuck Bennett and Jim Thompson swept to victory, to join incumbents Don Weaver and Gary MacFarland in a new majority pledging to "get out of the land-use planning business."

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 home

Šislavistahistory.com 2002